
Austin Campbell: stablecoins move bank deposits rather than destroy them
- —Campbell: creating or redeeming a stablecoin moves a deposit between owners, it does not vanish
- —An individual bank can lose deposits, but the banking system as a whole does not
- —Stablecoins resemble cash or money-market instruments more than leveraged bank deposits
- —ABA and ICBA want limits on stablecoins that pay holders a yield
Why it matters: The argument shapes the debate over banning yield-bearing stablecoins: if deposits only shift, restrictions look more like bank protectionism than prudence.
Source: Crypto Briefing
More on this
Security · Oct 13After Ledger Reseller Hack, Austin Campbell Says Self-Custody Users Should 'Over-Solve for Simplicity'
DeFi · Oct 14Banks Move Deposits On-Chain as Tokenized Deposits Challenge Stablecoins
Regulation · Oct 22OCC Eases Stablecoin Reserve Rules as Banks Warn of Deposit Flight