Crypto users weigh hardware wallets after $93M tampered-device scandal
- —Ledger confirmed a hidden implant in a device from reseller CryptoBilis; losses estimated at $93 million
- —Reference weights: Nano X is 34 g, Trezor Safe 3 is 14 g
- —Former Mt. Gox CEO Karpeles found an implant in a sealed Nano X bought in Malaysia, residual difference about 1 g
- —Ledger halted reseller sales and advises against setting up wallets bought from CryptoBilis
Why it matters: Hardware wallet attacks are shifting from software to the device itself, making direct-from-manufacturer purchases more important than home tests.
Source: BeInCrypto IT
More on this
Security · Oct 10Ledger distributor scandal sparks debate over hardware wallet tamper-proofing
Security · yesterdayLedger supply-chain attack spreads to Europe as user finds hardware implant in wallet
Exchanges · Oct 10CZ weighs in on wallet security: not against hardware wallets, YZi Labs backed OneKey and SafePal